In fact, in literature it is described that strain-rate-analysis is more sensitive to myocardial movement disorder than normal echocardiography. But I´m not sure whether I do that measurement in the bright way. It could be that there is a hypokinesia in inferior wall segment, but I´m not sure: that bidimensional echocardiographic picture is not a clear view with low quality (sorry). In my daily work I try to use that strain rate analysis to train that kind of myocardial study.
about 75 y old patient with typical chest-pain with irradiation of left shoulder, dyspnoea; high-risk-patient (diabetes mellitus type 2, arterial hypertension, hyperlipoproteinaemia). In ECG I found no specific signs for myocardial ischaemia; in TTE no myocardial movement disorder. Using strain-rate-analysis we found a posterior/inf. and small anteroseptal movement disorder. high-sensitive Troponin was positive. In cardiac catheter we found a two vessel-desease (RCA, LAD) with leading high-grade stenosis of RCA.
Hello Pablo!
In fact, in literature it is described that
strain-rate-analysis is more sensitive to myocardial movement disorder
than normal echocardiography. But I´m not sure whether I do that
measurement in the bright way.
It could be that there is a
hypokinesia in inferior wall segment, but I´m not sure: that
bidimensional echocardiographic picture is not a clear view with low
quality (sorry).
In my daily work I try to use that strain rate
analysis to train that kind of myocardial study.
Hello Jörg. Very good case and clips.
It seems that strain
rate is more sensitive for detection of myocardial ischemia/infarction
than bidimensional echo.?
Anyway...in bidimensional A2C
view hypokinesia of basal segments of inferior wall looks present?
/>
Best
Pablo